cfk10 wrote:

hey guys,

i have been a canon 5d mark iv shooter for a long time and bought a r6mark ii and when I look at my 5d images - in most cases - they look way better, there is more quality to the image. there is 6mp difference, i know, but it came as a surprise to me. I downloaded the preview sample gallery of the r5 and still I think the 5d mark iv images look better.

the r5/r6 images don't look bad, but there is just more quality in the image of the 5d mark iv. I also like the colors of the 5d more than the r6/r5.

I was wondering if IBIS is the cause of this quality loss, I have no pro engineering experience but it feels like too much shake correction with is and ibis is decreasing image quality. for me it feels like a static sensor provides better images, but of course, you have more steady shots with the r system.

I was wondering if anyone experienced something similar, because on youtube everyone is kind of declaring the r5 as the clear winner, but for me it is tough to say that. AF, video specs yes, but just photo quality, I think the 5D Mark IV is even better.

Isn't this the exact same question/conversation you started, at about the same time, in your other thread?

--
WLW